Compare and contrast relative and radiometric dating

25-Dec-2015 13:52 by 6 Comments

Compare and contrast relative and radiometric dating - freshman boy dating junior girl

Give specific examples, and briefly discuss how some materials may be linked to different types of volcanoes.

Most people accept the current old-earth (OE) age estimate of around 4.6 billion years.

This age is obtained from radiometric dating and is assumed by evolutionists to provide a sufficiently long time-frame for Darwinian evolution.

And OE Christians (theistic evolutionists) see no problem with this dating whilst still accepting biblical creation, see Radiometric Dating - A Christian Perspective.

This is the crucial point: it is claimed by some that an old earth supports evolutionary theory and by implication removes the need for biblical creation.

Relative dating is less precise than radiometric dating.

When you use radiometric dating, you get a numeric answer...

for instance, you may find that a rock is 230 million years old thr...Compare and contrast relative age dating with radiometric dating. References In-text citations required for all referenced material!!What are the strengths and limitations (if any) of each? Reference list is required too with proper reference page citations in addition to in text citation.3.Volcanoes are generally not preserved in the geologic rock record as they are usually eroded away.However, the various materials erupted from volcanoes are often found preserved in the rock record.From what you have learned about the different types of volcanoes, how could you infer what type of volcano erupted in a given area based on the type of volcanic deposits now found as layers of rock?